LATEST MANUSCRIPTS IN Research Integrity and Peer Review
Gregory M Eckhartt, Graeme D Ruxton. Investigating and preventing scientific misconduct using Benford's Law.Research integrity and peer review. 2023, 8 (1): 1
Stephen A Gallo, Michael Pearce, Carole J Lee, Elena A Erosheva. A new approach to grant review assessments: score, then rank.Research integrity and peer review. 2023, 8 (1): 10
Sherif Ahmed Kamel, Tamer A El-Sobky. Reporting quality of abstracts and inconsistencies with full text articles in pediatric orthopedic publications.Research integrity and peer review. 2023, 8 (1): 11
Anna Nuechterlein, Tanya Barretto, Alaa Yehia, Judy Illes. Bridges of perspectives: representation of people with lived experience of spinal cord injury in editorial boards and peer review.Research integrity and peer review. 2023, 8 (1): 12
Thomas Perneger. Authorship and citation patterns of highly cited biomedical researchers: a cross-sectional study.Research integrity and peer review. 2023, 8 (1): 13
Piitu Parmanne, Joonas Laajava, Noora Järvinen, Terttu Harju, Mauri Marttunen, Pertti Saloheimo. Peer reviewers' willingness to review, their recommendations and quality of reviews after the Finnish Medical Journal switched from single-blind to double-blind peer review.Research integrity and peer review. 2023, 8 (1): 14
Karen B Schmaling, Stephen A Gallo. Gender differences in peer reviewed grant applications, awards, and amounts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Research integrity and peer review. 2023, 8 (1): 2
Allana G LeBlanc, Joel D Barnes, Travis J Saunders, Mark S Tremblay, Jean-Philippe Chaput. Scientific sinkhole: estimating the cost of peer review based on survey data with snowball sampling.Research integrity and peer review. 2023, 8 (1): 3
Mohammad Hosseini, Serge P J M Horbach. Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review.Research integrity and peer review. 2023, 8 (1): 4
Yi Kai Ong, Kay L Double, Lisa Bero, Joanna Diong. Responsible research practices could be more strongly endorsed by Australian university codes of research conduct.Research integrity and peer review. 2023, 8 (1): 5
Ben W Mol, Shimona Lai, Ayesha Rahim, Esmée M Bordewijk, Rui Wang, Rik van Eekelen, Lyle C Gurrin, Jim G Thornton, Madelon van Wely, Wentao Li. Checklist to assess Trustworthiness in RAndomised Controlled Trials (TRACT checklist): concept proposal and pilot.Research integrity and peer review. 2023, 8 (1): 6
Mohammad Hosseini, Serge P J M Horbach. Publisher Correction: Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review.Research integrity and peer review. 2023, 8 (1): 7
Edwin Were, Jepchirchir Kiplagat, Eunice Kaguiri, Rose Ayikukwei, Violet Naanyu. Institutional capacity to prevent and manage research misconduct: perspectives from Kenyan research regulators.Research integrity and peer review. 2023, 8 (1): 8
Fabrice Frank, Nans Florens, Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz, Jérôme Barriere, Éric Billy, Véronique Saada, Alexander Samuel, Jacques Robert, Lonni Besançon. Raising concerns on questionable ethics approvals - a case study of 456 trials from the Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection.Research integrity and peer review. 2023, 8 (1): 9