SUBJECTS : Peer Review | Research Ethics | Publication Ethics | Research Reportin
Research Integrity and Peer Review: 2020, vol: 5, issue:
- 1)- Robin Mason. Doing better: eleven ways to improve the integration of sex and gender in health research proposals. Research integrity and peer review. 2020, 5 (1): 15
Cited : 4Read More - 2)- Clarissa F D Carneiro, Victor G S Queiroz, Thiago C Moulin, Carlos A M Carvalho, Clarissa B Haas, Danielle Rayêe, David E Henshall, Evandro A De-Souza, Felippe E Amorim, Flávia Z Boos, Gerson D Guercio, Igor R Costa, Karina L Hajdu, Lieve van Egmond, Martin Modrák, Pedro B Tan, Richard J Abdill, Steven J Burgess, Sylvia F S Guerra, Vanessa T Bortoluzzi, Olavo B Amaral. Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature. Research integrity and peer review. 2020, 5 (1): 16Cited : 76Read More
- 3)- Michael Kalichman. Survey study of research integrity officers' perceptions of research practices associated with instances of research misconduct. Research integrity and peer review. 2020, 5 (1): 17Cited : 5Read More
- 4)- Markus Konkol, Daniel Nüst, Laura Goulier. Publishing computational research - a review of infrastructures for reproducible and transparent scholarly communication. Research integrity and peer review. 2020, 5: 10Cited : 17Read More
- 5)- Serge P J M Horbach, Willem Halffman. Innovating editorial practices: academic publishers at work. Research integrity and peer review. 2020, 5: 11Cited : 11Read More
- 6)- Dennis M Gorman, Alva O Ferdinand. High impact nutrition and dietetics journals' use of publication procedures to increase research transparency. Research integrity and peer review. 2020, 5: 12Cited : 8Read More
- 7)- Mohammad Hosseini, Martin Paul Eve, Bert Gordijn, Cameron Neylon. MyCites: a proposal to mark and report inaccurate citations in scholarly publications. Research integrity and peer review. 2020, 5: 13Cited : 11Read More
- 8)- Courtenay Cavanaugh, Yara Abu Hussein. Do journals instruct authors to address sex and gender in psychological science? Research integrity and peer review. 2020, 5: 14Cited : 5Read More
- 9)- Shelby Rauh, Trevor Torgerson, Austin L Johnson, Jonathan Pollard, Daniel Tritz, Matt Vassar. Reproducible and transparent research practices in published neurology research. Research integrity and peer review. 2020, 5: 5Cited : 22Read More
- 10)- Jonathan P Tennant, Tony Ross-Hellauer. The limitations to our understanding of peer review. Research integrity and peer review. 2020, 5: 6Cited : 139Read More
- 11)- Stephen A Gallo, Karen B Schmaling, Lisa A Thompson, Scott R Glisson. Grant reviewer perceptions of the quality, effectiveness, and influence of panel discussion. Research integrity and peer review. 2020, 5: 7Cited : 7Read More
- 12)- Lonni Besançon, Niklas Rönnberg, Jonas Löwgren, Jonathan P Tennant, Matthew Cooper. Open up: a survey on open and non-anonymized peer reviewing. Research integrity and peer review. 2020, 5: 8Cited : 16Read More
- 13)- Travis G Gerwing, Alyssa M Allen Gerwing, Stephanie Avery-Gomm, Chi-Yeung Choi, Jeff C Clements, Joshua A Rash. Quantifying professionalism in peer review. Research integrity and peer review. 2020, 5: 9Cited : 36Read More
